What Does It Take for a Quantum Computer to Actually Be “Quantum”?
- A new experiment tests what makes a quantum computer genuinely quantum by using a simple game that demonstrates a provable advantage from quantum superposition, without relying on entanglement or assumptions about classical computational difficulty.
- The test was demonstrated on Quantinuum’s System Model H2, where researchers ran thousands of circuits and observed results close to theoretical quantum predictions. The approach also offers an efficiently verifiable way to test for non-classical behavior.
- The work provides a new way to think about quantum-computing verification: rather than focusing only on metrics like qubit count, we can ask whether a machine demonstrates capabilities that fundamentally distinguish quantum systems from classical ones. This validates that the computer is working as intended.
Building a quantum computer is one thing. Showing that it is genuinely using quantum mechanics is another.
A new experiment, just published in Nature Communications, takes a fresh approach to that question. Instead of relying on entanglement or the complex calculations often used to benchmark quantum computers, researchers designed a simple game (initially published in Physical Review Letters) that tests something more fundamental: quantum superposition.
Using superposition, the team constructed a game where quantum mechanics provides a provable advantage over classical approaches. Once the game was set, the team ran it on real hardware. The results showed a clear performance gap between the best possible classical system and our System Model H2 – a gap that only grew as the test became more difficult.
A game that classical computers can’t win
The game is played by a single player with access to a computer. The player receives a quantum state representing a set of numbers—for example, {0, 1, 5, 7}. Their goal is to return a number that belongs to the complement of that set: {2, 3, 4, 6}.
That sounds simple. But as the size of the sets grows, something remarkable happens.
A classical strategy needs to test many numbers to succeed. A quantum strategy, however, succeeds in one step. The authors show that the quantum strategy has a score that grows exponentially faster.
Importantly, this isn't based on an assumption that this problem is difficult for classical computers. The separation is mathematically proven. In other words, the researchers can show that the quantum advantage exists without relying on unproven assumptions from complexity theory.
Using our System Model H2, the experimenters were able to confirm the theoretically derived separation between the quantum and the classical strategy (up to the largest sizes they could fit on the quantum processor) with high confidence – showing that the violation remained close to exponential.
Testing quantum mechanics without entanglement
Many famous experiments testing quantum behavior rely on entanglement and non-locality, where multiple parties share parts of a quantum system.
This experiment is different.
There is only one player, who has access to the entire quantum system. The advantage comes from superposition—the ability of a quantum system to exist in a combination of states until it is measured.
That distinction matters because it provides another way to ask whether a quantum computer is actually behaving quantum mechanically.
The researchers turned their game into an experimental test and ran thousands of different circuits on Quantinuum's System Model H2. The scores they observed were close to the theoretical predictions for a quantum strategy.
Why verification matters
One of the challenges with existing quantum-computing demonstrations is figuring out whether the machine really produced the result it was supposed to produce.
For example, random circuit sampling can be extremely difficult to verify classically as systems become larger. That creates a tension: you want to demonstrate that a quantum computer is doing something a classical computer cannot easily reproduce, but you also need a practical way to check the result.
The complement-sampling game offers a different approach. The violation of classical performance can be efficiently verified with a classical computer.
That makes the test potentially more scalable: you don't need to reproduce the entire quantum computation on a classical computer just to determine whether the machine demonstrated non-classical behavior.
So, what makes a quantum computer “quantum”?
The deeper message of the experiment is that demonstrating a quantum computer isn't simply about having qubits.
A convincing demonstration should show that the machine is exploiting properties that genuinely distinguish quantum computation from classical computation. Here, the researchers focus on one of those defining properties—superposition—and construct a game where quantum mechanics provides a provable advantage.
This first experimental demonstration of complement sampling doesn't close every possible loophole, which is common for this sort of experiment – closing the major experimental loopholes in Bell-inequality tests took decades—a body of work that ultimately contributed to the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. The researchers explicitly note that the implementation relies on assumptions about how the input state is prepared, so the experimental results should be interpreted with some caution.
Still, the work provides a new way to probe the boundary between classical and quantum computation.
And that may be the most interesting part: rather than asking only “How many qubits does the machine have?”, we can ask a more meaningful question—
“What can this machine do that only a quantum system can?”
That is ultimately what it takes for a quantum computer to actually be quantum.
About Quantinuum
Quantinuum, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. Quantinuum’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, Quantinuum leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
- Our team, in partnership with HQS Quantum Simulations, just published what we believe to be the most accurate1 large-scale quantum simulation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to date, pointing the way to new frontiers in computational chemistry.
- NMR is a widely used analytical technique that can require significant computational costs to interpret, costs that can balloon quickly on classical systems.
- In this result, the joint team ran an end-to-end simulation on System Model H2, reproducing key spectral features that previous demonstrations were unable to capture.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is one of the most powerful analytical techniques in modern science. From identifying drug candidates to understanding battery materials, it allows researchers to probe the local atomic structure of molecules and materials with remarkable precision.
Interpreting NMR experiments often requires simulations that are just as challenging as the experiments themselves. As the number of interacting nuclear spins grows, the computational cost of simulating these systems increases exponentially on classical computers. Quantum computers, which naturally represent and evolve quantum states, offer a fundamentally different approach.
In our latest work, we demonstrate the most accurate large-scale digital NMR simulation performed on quantum hardware to date. Using Quantinuum's System Model H2, we carried out an end-to-end simulation of a classically challenging NMR experiment, reproducing key spectral features that previous hardware demonstrations were unable to capture.
Why simulate NMR?
NMR is a cornerstone of chemical analysis. Researchers use it to determine molecular structures, characterize new compounds, and study how atoms interact with one another.
These capabilities make NMR indispensable across industry. In pharmaceutical research, NMR helps identify and characterize drug candidates. In materials science, it reveals the local atomic environments that determine material properties. Battery researchers, for example, use NMR to study cathode materials such as lithium cobalt oxide, allowing them to monitor how the material changes during charging and discharging and ultimately improve battery performance.
In many cases, the experimental spectrum is only part of the story. Simulations help scientists interpret complex spectra by revealing which atomic interactions give rise to the observed peaks. They provide the link between an experimental measurement and the underlying molecular structure.
The classical challenge and the quantum solution
The difficulty lies in the physics.
An NMR experiment measures the dynamics of interacting nuclear spins. Every additional spin rapidly increases the size of the quantum state that must be represented (in the case of a spin-½ particle, every spin doubles the state). As a result, exact classical simulations become exponentially more expensive as the system size grows.
Today's best classical methods are remarkably sophisticated. Exact simulations are typically limited to systems of around 25 interacting spins, while advanced approximation techniques can often extend calculations to roughly 40–50 spins for many practical problems.
Those approximations have made classical NMR software extraordinarily effective for conventional liquid-state spectroscopy. In fact, our collaborators on this project are developing one of the leading classical simulation packages and noted that, despite the success of our quantum experiment, the current spectral resolution is still insufficient for routine use by practicing spectroscopists. Resolving the fine structure needed for many real-world analyses would require substantially longer simulations—and therefore much deeper quantum circuits than current hardware can yet support.
This highlights both the progress and the remaining challenge. Quantum computers are beginning to produce meaningful NMR spectra, but practical utility will require larger quantum computers and increased simulation depth.
In the longer term, interacting spin systems are among the most natural applications for quantum computers. Instead of storing the exponentially large quantum state explicitly, a quantum computer represents it directly in its physical qubits. For spin-½ nuclei, the mapping is particularly efficient: each nuclear spin corresponds directly to a single qubit. Higher-spin nuclei require only a small number of additional qubits.
This does not eliminate every computational challenge—longer simulations still require deeper quantum circuits—but it avoids the exponential memory bottleneck that limits classical simulation.
For NMR, this makes quantum simulation an especially compelling long-term application.
Our experiment
Working with collaborators at HQS Quantum Simulations, we implemented a complete quantum workflow for simulating an NMR experiment on Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum computer.
Rather than stopping at Hamiltonian simulation alone, we reproduced the entire computational pipeline:
- constructing the nuclear spin Hamiltonian,
- compiling efficient quantum circuits,
- simulating the spin dynamics through Trotterized real-time evolution,
- applying targeted error-suppression techniques,
- reconstructing the free induction decay, and
- generating the final NMR spectrum through Fourier analysis.
The benchmark molecule, 1,2-di-tert-butyl-diphosphane, is a well-known challenge for NMR simulation. After applying hardware-efficient model reduction, we simulated an effective 21-spin Hamiltonian using a 42-qubit (21 system qubits and 21 ancilla qubits) computation on System Model H2.
Our deepest circuits reached over 1,400 two-qubit gates and simulated 70 Trotter steps, corresponding to approximately 29 ms of physical evolution time.
Most importantly, the resulting spectrum reproduced the key benchmark features of the classical reference calculation, including a characteristic double-peak structure that previous quantum hardware demonstrations had failed to recover.
This represents the most complete hardware demonstration of digital NMR simulation reported to date.
Why trapped ions mattered
Achieving this result depended not only on the quantum algorithm but also on the underlying hardware.
Large Hamiltonian simulations require long, high-fidelity quantum circuits. Quantinuum's trapped-ion architecture provides all-to-all qubit connectivity, high-fidelity gates, and effective error-suppression techniques that allowed us to preserve the spectroscopic features throughout the computation.
The close agreement between hardware, emulator, and classical reference calculations demonstrates that deep quantum simulations of chemically meaningful systems are becoming increasingly feasible on today's hardware.
Looking ahead
To make quantum NMR genuinely useful for practicing spectroscopists, future systems will need substantially deeper circuits.
Our experiment simulated approximately 29 ms of evolution time, producing spectral features with a resolution of roughly 0.07 ppm, a very promising start.
Reaching that scale will require continued improvements in hardware fidelity, error correction, and quantum algorithms.
Nevertheless, this work demonstrates that digital quantum simulation of realistic NMR experiments is no longer purely theoretical. It establishes a practical end-to-end workflow, validates key algorithmic techniques, and shows that quantum computers can already reproduce chemically meaningful spectral signatures.
As quantum hardware continues to improve, applications such as molecular spectroscopy, materials characterization, and chemical simulation are becoming increasingly realistic targets for practical quantum computing.
1 Based on a study of existing literature
- In a recent independent study by the Julich Supercomputing Center, Quantinuum’s trapped-ion systems outperformed superconducting processors in tests of fault tolerant operations.
- Testing small chunks of circuits that would be used in larger QEC workflows, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately 10x lower effective hardware error compared to superconducting systems.
- Quantinuum’s flexible connectivity enabled tests across three error-correcting code families, compared to just one for superconducting systems, illustrating the expanding options for advancing fault tolerance with our QCCD architecture.
The demands of fault tolerance are bringing Quantinuum’s advantages into sharper focus.
In a new independent study from the Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately order-of-magnitude advantage over superconducting hardware in tests of operations essential to quantum error correction. More precisely, Helios’ effective hardware error was approximately 13 times lower at 30 data qubits and eight times lower at 50 data qubits than the comparable superconducting result.
The advantage extended to architectural flexibility. Quantinuum’s systems supported tests across three error-correcting code families, while connectivity and control restrictions limited implementation to only one on the superconducting devices evaluated.
These findings build on earlier independent research by the same organization highlighting Quantinuum’s physical-level performance. As we have argued, the NISQ era is coming to an end. The demands of error correction are bringing our architectural differences into sharper focus—and this study provides further evidence of Quantinuum’s advantage.
Error correction exposes performance gaps
A fault-tolerant quantum computer must repeatedly detect and correct errors to protect the computation in progress. That requires reliable mid-circuit measurements, conditional operations, and real-time coordinated scheduling.
In a direct comparison, introducing mid-circuit measurement caused substantially greater degradation on the superconducting processors compared to the Quantinuum systems.
That difference matters. Mid-circuit measurement must be repeated throughout fault-tolerant computations. Their (potential) performance penalty directly affects how much computation a machine can sustain.
Helios demonstrated strong performance under those demands, extending its advantage beyond the physical layer into circuits exercising essential error-correction capabilities.
Connectivity expands the options
The study also highlighted how architectural restrictions affect which error-correction structures hardware can implement directly.
On Quantinuum’s systems, researchers ran tests exploring the surface-code, triangular color-code, and a bivariate-bicycle qLDPC code. In contrast, the superconducting devices evaluated were only able to explore the surface code due to device constraints.
This is because Quantinuum’s QCCD architecture offers greater flexibility: mobile qubits enable codes that require higher connectivity than is allowed on traditional superconducting processors. Ultimately, this gives researchers more freedom to explore multiple codes—and more opportunities to reduce the qubit and time overheads of fault tolerance.
Building on an architectural advantage
The Jülich study provides independent evidence that Quantinuum’s architectural choices deliver advantages for operations essential to fault tolerance. It also reveals performance and implementation gaps in the superconducting systems tested.
We intend to extend that lead. Our investments in fidelity, flexible connectivity, and integrated control are foundations for increasingly capable machines.
As error-correction workloads become more demanding, those capabilities become more consequential. Quantinuum is building to meet that challenge—and to keep raising the performance bar.
Thirty participants gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge, for an intensive five-day programme exploring how quantum computers can be used to model chemical systems.
By: Duncan Gowland, Senior Advanced R&D Scientist at Quantinuum
For 30 researchers who gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge this September, that question shaped an intensive five-day programme.
Quantinuum’s first InQuanto Summer School, supported by the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre (NQCC), combined lectures, hands-on workshops, and mini-projects to help participants connect fundamental concepts with practical research. By the end of the week, participants were applying those ideas to problems ranging from molecular electronic structure to quantum state-preparation circuits.
Applying quantum computing to chemistry can be challenging because it draws on expertise from a broad range of areas, including electronic structure theory, quantum algorithms, software, hardware, noise modelling, and resource estimation. Researchers often enter the field with deep knowledge of one or two of these areas but less familiarity with the others.
A key objective of the course was to help researchers from computational chemistry and quantum computing build stronger foundations, develop a shared language, and deepen their understanding of adjacent disciplines.
For researchers beginning work at this intersection, that shared understanding can make it easier to identify where to start, which assumptions to challenge, and when to seek expertise from another discipline.
Bringing Theory and Practice Together
The programme began with lectures on the foundations of quantum computing, followed by pen-and-paper and computational exercises in the afternoon. On Day 2, lectures and workshops introduced the electronic structure problem: how quantum chemists describe the behaviour of electrons in molecules.
Students then brought these two foundations together by studying fermion-to-qubit mappings, which translate chemistry problems into a form that quantum computers can process, before moving on to the measurement of chemistry observables and the construction of quantum algorithms.
Learners were given free access to InQuanto, Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry software platform designed to accelerate research in fields such as chemistry and condensed matter physics using quantum computers. InQuanto supported the lectures as a broad, well-documented, and thoroughly tested platform that enabled students to explore and reinforce complex concepts through hands-on experience.
Later in the week, attention shifted to state-of-the-art considerations: how to build useful chemical models, make the best use of current quantum devices, and think about how quantum algorithms for chemistry might develop over the next five to ten years.
The students, who travelled from around the world to Cambridge, brought a remarkable range of backgrounds and experience. The material was pitched at roughly first-year doctoral level, for participants with at least a year of experience in one core area and some Python skills. Even with this experience, participants benefited from exposure to other disciplines and from the practical expertise of Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry team—which brings years of experience working with industrial including BMW Group, TotalEnergies, NVIDIA, and Pfizer.
Throughout the week, participants were highly engaged in lectures and brought a thoughtful, collaborative approach to the workshop exercises. Discussions continued throughout the week, from coffee breaks to lunches and dinners, creating valuable opportunities to exchange ideas and experiences.
A particular highlight was the mini-project work. In just a day and a half, participants tackled a wide range of problems and produced impressive prototype solutions. The projects concluded with a poster-style session, where the quality of discussion was exceptional. Examples included state-preparation programmes using mid-circuit measurement in Guppy; investigations of active-space selection and quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) for the chromium dimer; and the use of the atomic valence active space (AVAS) approach to identify active spaces and perform resource estimation for myoglobin.
One participant reimplemented their research on efficient state-preparation circuits based on orbital entanglement in InQuanto and compared the performance of those circuits with the platform’s efficient ansatz methods on the Helios emulator. It was rewarding to see participants apply these tools to their own research challenges and explore new approaches to quantum chemistry.
With Support from the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre
This rewarding week was made possible through the support of the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre, whose partnership helped bring the programme to life, and by the contributions of colleagues across Quantinuum. The teaching team brought together experts from our quantum chemistry, compiler, and error-correction teams, who developed the course materials, delivered lectures, and led the workshops.
Above all, the programme demonstrated the value of bringing researchers together around a shared foundation, practical tools, and opportunities to learn from one another. We look forward to seeing how participants build on these ideas in their future research.
Interested in future training opportunities, workshops, and community events from Quantinuum? Join QNET to stay connected with the latest updates, resources, and opportunities to engage with the quantum computing community.