Quantum Volume reaches 5 digits for the first time
5 perspectives on what it means for quantum computing
Quantinuum’s H-Series team has hit the ground running in 2023, achieving a new performance milestone. The H1-1 trapped ion quantum computer has achieved a Quantum Volume (QV) of 32,768 (215), the highest in the industry to date.
The team previously increased the QV to 8,192 (or 213) for the System Model H1 system in September, less than six months ago. The next goal was a QV of 16,384 (214). However, continuous improvements to the H1-1's controls and subsystems advanced the system enough to successfully reach 214 as expected, and then to go one major step further, and reach a QV of 215.
The Quantum Volume test is a full-system benchmark that produces a single-number measure of a quantum computer’s general capability. The benchmark takes into account qubit number, fidelity, connectivity, and other quantities important in building useful devices.1 While other measures such as gate fidelity and qubit count are significant and worth tracking, neither is as comprehensive as Quantum Volume which better represents the operational ability of a quantum computer.
Dr. Brian Neyenhuis, Director of Commercial Operations, credits reductions in the phase noise of the computer’s lasers as one key factor in the increase.
"We've had enough qubits for a while, but we've been continually pushing on reducing the error in our quantum operations, specifically the two-qubit gate error, to allow us to do these Quantum Volume measurements,” he said.
The Quantinuum team improved memory error and elements of the calibration process as well.
“It was a lot of little things that got us to the point where our two-qubit gate error and our memory error are both low enough that we can pass these Quantum Volume circuit tests,” he said.
The work of increasing Quantum Volume means improving all the subsystems and subcomponents of the machine individually and simultaneously, while ensuring all the systems continue to work well together. Such a complex task takes a high degree of orchestration across the Quantinuum team, with the benefits of the work passed on to H-Series users.
To illustrate what this 5-digit Quantum Volume milestone means for the H-Series, here are 5 perspectives that reflect Quantinuum teams and H-Series users.
Perspective #1: How a higher QV impacts algorithms
Dr. Henrik Dreyer is Managing Director and Scientific Lead at Quantinuum’s office in Munich, Germany. In the context of his work, an improvement in Quantum Volume is important as it relates to gate fidelity.
“As application developers, the signal-to-noise ratio is what we're interested in,” Henrik said. “If the signal is small, I might run the circuits 10 times and only get one good shot. To recover the signal, I have to do a lot more shots and throw most of them away. Every shot takes time."
“The signal-to-noise ratio is sensitive to the gate fidelity. If you increase the gate fidelity by a little bit, the runtime of a given algorithm may go down drastically,” he said. “For a typical circuit, as the plot shows, even a relatively modest 0.16 percentage point improvement in fidelity, could mean that it runs in less than half the time.”
To demonstrate this point, the Quantinuum team has been benchmarking the System Model H1 performance on circuits relevant for near-term applications. The graph below shows repeated benchmarking of the runtime of these circuits before and after the recent improvement in gate fidelity. The result of this moderate change in fidelity is a 3x change in runtime. The runtimes calculated below are based on the number of shots required to obtain accurate results from the benchmarking circuit – the example uses 430 arbitrary-angle two-qubit gates and an accuracy of 3%.
Perspective #2: Advancing quantum error correction
Dr. Natalie Brown and Dr, Ciaran Ryan-Anderson both work on quantum error correction at Quantinuum. They see the QV advance as an overall boost to this work.
“Hitting a Quantum Volume number like this means that you have low error rates, a lot of qubits, and very long circuits,” Natalie said. “And all three of those are wonderful things for quantum error correction. A higher Quantum Volume most certainly means we will be able to run quantum error correction better. Error correction is a critical ingredient to large-scale quantum computing. The earlier we can start exploring error correction on today’s small-scale hardware, the faster we’ll be able to demonstrate it at large-scale.”
Ciaran said that H1-1's low error rates allow scientists to make error correction better and start to explore decoding options.
“If you can have really low error rates, you can apply a lot of quantum operations, known as gates,” Ciaran said. "This makes quantum error correction easier because we can suppress the noise even further and potentially use fewer resources to do it, compared to other devices.”
Perspective #3: Meeting a high benchmark
“This accomplishment shows that gate improvements are getting translated to full-system circuits,” said Dr. Charlie Baldwin, a research scientist at Quantinuum.
Charlie specializes in quantum computing performance benchmarks, conducting research with the Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C).
“Other benchmarking tests use easier circuits or incorporate other options like post-processing data. This can make it more difficult to determine what part improved,” he said. “With Quantum Volume, it’s clear that the performance improvements are from the hardware, which are the hardest and most significant improvements to make.”
“Quantum Volume is a well-established test. You really can’t cheat it,” said Charlie.
Perspective #4: Implications for quantum applications
Dr. Ross Duncan, Head of Quantum Software, sees Quantum Volume measurements as a good way to show overall progress in the process of building a quantum computer.
“Quantum Volume has merit, compared to any other measure, because it gives a clear answer,” he said.
“This latest increase reveals the extent of combined improvements in the hardware in recent months and means researchers and developers can expect to run deeper circuits with greater success.”
Perspective #5: H-Series users
Quantinuum’s business model is unique in that the H-Series systems are continuously upgraded through their product lifecycle. For users, this means they continually and immediately get access to the latest breakthroughs in performance. The reported improvements were not done on an internal testbed, but rather implemented on the H1-1 system which is commercially available and used extensively by users around the world.
“As soon as the improvements were implemented, users were benefiting from them,” said Dr. Jenni Strabley, Sr. Director of Offering Management. “We take our Quantum Volume measurement intermixed with customers’ jobs, so we know that the improvements we’re seeing are also being seen by our customers.”
Jenni went on to say, “Continuously delivering increasingly better performance shows our commitment to our customers’ success with these early small-scale quantum computers as well as our commitment to accuracy and transparency. That’s how we accelerate quantum computing.”
Supporting data from Quantinuum’s 215 QV milestone
This latest QV milestone demonstrates how the Quantinuum team continues to boost the performance of the System Model H1, making improvements to the two-qubit gate fidelity while maintaining high single-qubit fidelity, high SPAM fidelity, and low cross-talk.
The average single-qubit gate fidelity for these milestones was 99.9955(8)%, the average two-qubit gate fidelity was 99.795(7)% with fully connected qubits, and state preparation and measurement fidelity was 99.69(4)%.
For both tests, the Quantinuum team ran 100 circuits with 200 shots each, using standard QV optimization techniques to yield an average of 219.02 arbitrary angle two-qubit gates per circuit on the 214 test, and 244.26 arbitrary angle two-qubit gates per circuit on the 215 test.
The Quantinuum H1-1 successfully passed the quantum volume 16,384 benchmark, outputting heavy outcomes 69.88% of the time, and passed the 32,768 benchmark, outputting heavy outcomes 69.075% of the time. The heavy output frequency is a simple measure of how well the measured outputs from the quantum computer match the results from an ideal simulation. Both results are above the two-thirds passing threshold with high confidence. More details on the Quantum Volume test can be found here.
Heavy output frequency for H1-1 at 215 (QV 32,768)
Heavy output frequency for H1-1 at 214 (QV 16,384)
Quantum Volume data and analysis code can be accessed on Quantinuum’s GitHub repository for quantum volume data. Contemporary benchmarking data can be accessed at Quantinuum’s GitHub repository for hardware specifications.
About Quantinuum
Quantinuum, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. Quantinuum’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, Quantinuum leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
- Our team, in partnership with HQS Quantum Simulations, just published what we believe to be the most accurate1 large-scale quantum simulation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to date, pointing the way to new frontiers in computational chemistry.
- NMR is a widely used analytical technique that can require significant computational costs to interpret, costs that can balloon quickly on classical systems.
- In this result, the joint team ran an end-to-end simulation on System Model H2, reproducing key spectral features that previous demonstrations were unable to capture.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is one of the most powerful analytical techniques in modern science. From identifying drug candidates to understanding battery materials, it allows researchers to probe the local atomic structure of molecules and materials with remarkable precision.
Interpreting NMR experiments often requires simulations that are just as challenging as the experiments themselves. As the number of interacting nuclear spins grows, the computational cost of simulating these systems increases exponentially on classical computers. Quantum computers, which naturally represent and evolve quantum states, offer a fundamentally different approach.
In our latest work, we demonstrate the most accurate large-scale digital NMR simulation performed on quantum hardware to date. Using Quantinuum's System Model H2, we carried out an end-to-end simulation of a classically challenging NMR experiment, reproducing key spectral features that previous hardware demonstrations were unable to capture.
Why simulate NMR?
NMR is a cornerstone of chemical analysis. Researchers use it to determine molecular structures, characterize new compounds, and study how atoms interact with one another.
These capabilities make NMR indispensable across industry. In pharmaceutical research, NMR helps identify and characterize drug candidates. In materials science, it reveals the local atomic environments that determine material properties. Battery researchers, for example, use NMR to study cathode materials such as lithium cobalt oxide, allowing them to monitor how the material changes during charging and discharging and ultimately improve battery performance.
In many cases, the experimental spectrum is only part of the story. Simulations help scientists interpret complex spectra by revealing which atomic interactions give rise to the observed peaks. They provide the link between an experimental measurement and the underlying molecular structure.
The classical challenge and the quantum solution
The difficulty lies in the physics.
An NMR experiment measures the dynamics of interacting nuclear spins. Every additional spin rapidly increases the size of the quantum state that must be represented (in the case of a spin-½ particle, every spin doubles the state). As a result, exact classical simulations become exponentially more expensive as the system size grows.
Today's best classical methods are remarkably sophisticated. Exact simulations are typically limited to systems of around 25 interacting spins, while advanced approximation techniques can often extend calculations to roughly 40–50 spins for many practical problems.
Those approximations have made classical NMR software extraordinarily effective for conventional liquid-state spectroscopy. In fact, our collaborators on this project are developing one of the leading classical simulation packages and noted that, despite the success of our quantum experiment, the current spectral resolution is still insufficient for routine use by practicing spectroscopists. Resolving the fine structure needed for many real-world analyses would require substantially longer simulations—and therefore much deeper quantum circuits than current hardware can yet support.
This highlights both the progress and the remaining challenge. Quantum computers are beginning to produce meaningful NMR spectra, but practical utility will require larger quantum computers and increased simulation depth.
In the longer term, interacting spin systems are among the most natural applications for quantum computers. Instead of storing the exponentially large quantum state explicitly, a quantum computer represents it directly in its physical qubits. For spin-½ nuclei, the mapping is particularly efficient: each nuclear spin corresponds directly to a single qubit. Higher-spin nuclei require only a small number of additional qubits.
This does not eliminate every computational challenge—longer simulations still require deeper quantum circuits—but it avoids the exponential memory bottleneck that limits classical simulation.
For NMR, this makes quantum simulation an especially compelling long-term application.
Our experiment
Working with collaborators at HQS Quantum Simulations, we implemented a complete quantum workflow for simulating an NMR experiment on Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum computer.
Rather than stopping at Hamiltonian simulation alone, we reproduced the entire computational pipeline:
- constructing the nuclear spin Hamiltonian,
- compiling efficient quantum circuits,
- simulating the spin dynamics through Trotterized real-time evolution,
- applying targeted error-suppression techniques,
- reconstructing the free induction decay, and
- generating the final NMR spectrum through Fourier analysis.
The benchmark molecule, 1,2-di-tert-butyl-diphosphane, is a well-known challenge for NMR simulation. After applying hardware-efficient model reduction, we simulated an effective 21-spin Hamiltonian using a 42-qubit (21 system qubits and 21 ancilla qubits) computation on System Model H2.
Our deepest circuits reached over 1,400 two-qubit gates and simulated 70 Trotter steps, corresponding to approximately 29 ms of physical evolution time.
Most importantly, the resulting spectrum reproduced the key benchmark features of the classical reference calculation, including a characteristic double-peak structure that previous quantum hardware demonstrations had failed to recover.
This represents the most complete hardware demonstration of digital NMR simulation reported to date.
Why trapped ions mattered
Achieving this result depended not only on the quantum algorithm but also on the underlying hardware.
Large Hamiltonian simulations require long, high-fidelity quantum circuits. Quantinuum's trapped-ion architecture provides all-to-all qubit connectivity, high-fidelity gates, and effective error-suppression techniques that allowed us to preserve the spectroscopic features throughout the computation.
The close agreement between hardware, emulator, and classical reference calculations demonstrates that deep quantum simulations of chemically meaningful systems are becoming increasingly feasible on today's hardware.
Looking ahead
To make quantum NMR genuinely useful for practicing spectroscopists, future systems will need substantially deeper circuits.
Our experiment simulated approximately 29 ms of evolution time, producing spectral features with a resolution of roughly 0.07 ppm, a very promising start.
Reaching that scale will require continued improvements in hardware fidelity, error correction, and quantum algorithms.
Nevertheless, this work demonstrates that digital quantum simulation of realistic NMR experiments is no longer purely theoretical. It establishes a practical end-to-end workflow, validates key algorithmic techniques, and shows that quantum computers can already reproduce chemically meaningful spectral signatures.
As quantum hardware continues to improve, applications such as molecular spectroscopy, materials characterization, and chemical simulation are becoming increasingly realistic targets for practical quantum computing.
1 Based on a study of existing literature
- In a recent independent study by the Julich Supercomputing Center, Quantinuum’s trapped-ion systems outperformed superconducting processors in tests of fault tolerant operations.
- Testing small chunks of circuits that would be used in larger QEC workflows, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately 10x lower effective hardware error compared to superconducting systems.
- Quantinuum’s flexible connectivity enabled tests across three error-correcting code families, compared to just one for superconducting systems, illustrating the expanding options for advancing fault tolerance with our QCCD architecture.
The demands of fault tolerance are bringing Quantinuum’s advantages into sharper focus.
In a new independent study from the Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately order-of-magnitude advantage over superconducting hardware in tests of operations essential to quantum error correction. More precisely, Helios’ effective hardware error was approximately 13 times lower at 30 data qubits and eight times lower at 50 data qubits than the comparable superconducting result.
The advantage extended to architectural flexibility. Quantinuum’s systems supported tests across three error-correcting code families, while connectivity and control restrictions limited implementation to only one on the superconducting devices evaluated.
These findings build on earlier independent research by the same organization highlighting Quantinuum’s physical-level performance. As we have argued, the NISQ era is coming to an end. The demands of error correction are bringing our architectural differences into sharper focus—and this study provides further evidence of Quantinuum’s advantage.
Error correction exposes performance gaps
A fault-tolerant quantum computer must repeatedly detect and correct errors to protect the computation in progress. That requires reliable mid-circuit measurements, conditional operations, and real-time coordinated scheduling.
In a direct comparison, introducing mid-circuit measurement caused substantially greater degradation on the superconducting processors compared to the Quantinuum systems.
That difference matters. Mid-circuit measurement must be repeated throughout fault-tolerant computations. Their (potential) performance penalty directly affects how much computation a machine can sustain.
Helios demonstrated strong performance under those demands, extending its advantage beyond the physical layer into circuits exercising essential error-correction capabilities.
Connectivity expands the options
The study also highlighted how architectural restrictions affect which error-correction structures hardware can implement directly.
On Quantinuum’s systems, researchers ran tests exploring the surface-code, triangular color-code, and a bivariate-bicycle qLDPC code. In contrast, the superconducting devices evaluated were only able to explore the surface code due to device constraints.
This is because Quantinuum’s QCCD architecture offers greater flexibility: mobile qubits enable codes that require higher connectivity than is allowed on traditional superconducting processors. Ultimately, this gives researchers more freedom to explore multiple codes—and more opportunities to reduce the qubit and time overheads of fault tolerance.
Building on an architectural advantage
The Jülich study provides independent evidence that Quantinuum’s architectural choices deliver advantages for operations essential to fault tolerance. It also reveals performance and implementation gaps in the superconducting systems tested.
We intend to extend that lead. Our investments in fidelity, flexible connectivity, and integrated control are foundations for increasingly capable machines.
As error-correction workloads become more demanding, those capabilities become more consequential. Quantinuum is building to meet that challenge—and to keep raising the performance bar.
Thirty participants gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge, for an intensive five-day programme exploring how quantum computers can be used to model chemical systems.
By: Duncan Gowland, Senior Advanced R&D Scientist at Quantinuum
For 30 researchers who gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge this September, that question shaped an intensive five-day programme.
Quantinuum’s first InQuanto Summer School, supported by the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre (NQCC), combined lectures, hands-on workshops, and mini-projects to help participants connect fundamental concepts with practical research. By the end of the week, participants were applying those ideas to problems ranging from molecular electronic structure to quantum state-preparation circuits.
Applying quantum computing to chemistry can be challenging because it draws on expertise from a broad range of areas, including electronic structure theory, quantum algorithms, software, hardware, noise modelling, and resource estimation. Researchers often enter the field with deep knowledge of one or two of these areas but less familiarity with the others.
A key objective of the course was to help researchers from computational chemistry and quantum computing build stronger foundations, develop a shared language, and deepen their understanding of adjacent disciplines.
For researchers beginning work at this intersection, that shared understanding can make it easier to identify where to start, which assumptions to challenge, and when to seek expertise from another discipline.
Bringing Theory and Practice Together
The programme began with lectures on the foundations of quantum computing, followed by pen-and-paper and computational exercises in the afternoon. On Day 2, lectures and workshops introduced the electronic structure problem: how quantum chemists describe the behaviour of electrons in molecules.
Students then brought these two foundations together by studying fermion-to-qubit mappings, which translate chemistry problems into a form that quantum computers can process, before moving on to the measurement of chemistry observables and the construction of quantum algorithms.
Learners were given free access to InQuanto, Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry software platform designed to accelerate research in fields such as chemistry and condensed matter physics using quantum computers. InQuanto supported the lectures as a broad, well-documented, and thoroughly tested platform that enabled students to explore and reinforce complex concepts through hands-on experience.
Later in the week, attention shifted to state-of-the-art considerations: how to build useful chemical models, make the best use of current quantum devices, and think about how quantum algorithms for chemistry might develop over the next five to ten years.
The students, who travelled from around the world to Cambridge, brought a remarkable range of backgrounds and experience. The material was pitched at roughly first-year doctoral level, for participants with at least a year of experience in one core area and some Python skills. Even with this experience, participants benefited from exposure to other disciplines and from the practical expertise of Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry team—which brings years of experience working with industrial including BMW Group, TotalEnergies, NVIDIA, and Pfizer.
Throughout the week, participants were highly engaged in lectures and brought a thoughtful, collaborative approach to the workshop exercises. Discussions continued throughout the week, from coffee breaks to lunches and dinners, creating valuable opportunities to exchange ideas and experiences.
A particular highlight was the mini-project work. In just a day and a half, participants tackled a wide range of problems and produced impressive prototype solutions. The projects concluded with a poster-style session, where the quality of discussion was exceptional. Examples included state-preparation programmes using mid-circuit measurement in Guppy; investigations of active-space selection and quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) for the chromium dimer; and the use of the atomic valence active space (AVAS) approach to identify active spaces and perform resource estimation for myoglobin.
One participant reimplemented their research on efficient state-preparation circuits based on orbital entanglement in InQuanto and compared the performance of those circuits with the platform’s efficient ansatz methods on the Helios emulator. It was rewarding to see participants apply these tools to their own research challenges and explore new approaches to quantum chemistry.
With Support from the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre
This rewarding week was made possible through the support of the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre, whose partnership helped bring the programme to life, and by the contributions of colleagues across Quantinuum. The teaching team brought together experts from our quantum chemistry, compiler, and error-correction teams, who developed the course materials, delivered lectures, and led the workshops.
Above all, the programme demonstrated the value of bringing researchers together around a shared foundation, practical tools, and opportunities to learn from one another. We look forward to seeing how participants build on these ideas in their future research.
Interested in future training opportunities, workshops, and community events from Quantinuum? Join QNET to stay connected with the latest updates, resources, and opportunities to engage with the quantum computing community.