With 20 Qubits, the H1-1 Quantum Runs More Complex Algorithm
Our flagship quantum computer, System Model H1-1, is now running on 20 qubits
We sat down with Brian Neyenhuis, Quantinuum’s director of commercial operations to ask him about the 20-qubit upgrade, some of the technical details, and how this launch paves the way for scaling trapped-ion quantum computers in the future.
What are some of the key upgrades made to the H1-1 machine?
The biggest, or maybe the most notable, is that we expanded the number of fully connected qubits from 12 to 20. That is a significant increase and the most qubits we’ve added to an existing machine. Last year, we added two fully connected qubits to the 10 qubits H1-1 already had. It was a major accomplishment at the time. Now, that seems easy compared to this upgrade because for us, it is not as simple as adding qubits.
To add eight more qubits and maintain all-to-all connectivity, we upgraded the optics that deliver the light used to control our qubits. Previously, we were only delivering the light needed to complete quantum gates to three different regions of the trap, which we call gate zones. Now we can address all five zones in our trap simultaneously. This enables us to complete more single-qubit or two-qubit gates in parallel, which means users can run complex algorithms without experiencing a slowdown.
How does this compare to previous hardware upgrades?
This one was significantly more involved than previous upgrades. Although we didn’t modify the trap at the heart of the computer or the vacuum chamber and cryostat that enclose it, we redesigned the entire optical delivery system. This was necessary so as not to deliver light to more regions of the trap, but also to improve stability.
Increasing the size and complexity of the machine without improving the stability would be a recipe for disaster. Because we were able to improve the stability, we were able to add more qubits without sacrificing performance or key features our users expect such as all-to-all connectivity, high single and two-qubit gate fidelities, and mid-circuit measurement.
Why is the increase in zones significant?
The gate zones are where all the interesting quantum stuff happens. More zones allow us to run more quantum operations in parallel, allowing for faster, more complex algorithms.
What's the connection between more zones and more qubits?
Having more gate zones allows us to use more qubits in an efficient way.
Because we can do all these operations in five different locations in parallel, it finally makes sense to put more qubits into the trap. We could have loaded more qubits into earlier versions of the system, but without additional gate zones, it doesn’t make a lot of sense. In fact, doing that would create a bottleneck with qubits waiting for their turn to do a two-qubit gate, which then slows down an algorithm. Now, we can do five quantum gates in parallel, which allows us to run more complex algorithms without sacrificing speed.
Twenty qubits are probably where this generation of traps ends. There is a possibility to add a handful more, but it feels like this is probably the most efficient number for these H1 Systems due to layout of the trap. But future generations, some of which are already trapping ions in the lab today, will use even more qubits and with the same or better efficiency.
What is the “ion dance”?
In the QCCD architecture, trapped ions are easy to move around. By applying the right set of voltages to the trap — a small, electrode-filled device that holds qubits in place — we can arbitrarily rearrange the chain of qubits so any qubit can pair with any other and perform a quantum gate. So, you can think of any algorithm as a set of steps where we shuffle all the qubits to pair them up for the next set of gates, move them into the gate zones, and then shuffle them again to set them up for the next set of gates. The ions “dance” across the trap moving from partner to partner to execute a quantum circuit.
Some circuits, like quantum volume circuits, are densely packed, meaning that every possible pair wants to do a gate at each step of the circuit. Other circuits are very loosely packed, meaning you can only do a few gates in parallel before moving on to the next slice because you need to reuse one of those qubits with a different partner.
Although this dance may sound complicated, it makes it very easy to program our quantum computer. A user sends us a time-ordered set of gates without having to think about the layout of the qubits, and our compiler figures out how to pair up the appropriate qubits to make it happen. You don't have to worry about which ones are next to each other because any pair of qubits is equal to all the others. And, at any step, we can completely rearrange this chain and put any two qubits next to each other.
It’s like a square dance where someone calls out directions to the dancers.
Anything else in the works for Quantinuum’s hardware this year?
We will continue to work with our customers to improve our system performance and their overall experience. One of the reasons we have a commercial system now is to allow our customers to program their algorithms on a real machine. They're dealing with all the constraints of real quantum hardware. They're pushing on their algorithms while we're pushing on the hardware, to get the fastest iterations.
As they learn new things about their algorithm, we learn what the most important things are to improve. And we work on those. We are learning a lot from our customers, and they are learning a lot by running on our hardware.
About Quantinuum
Quantinuum, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. Quantinuum’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, Quantinuum leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
In a follow-up to our recent work with Hiverge using AI to discover algorithms for quantum chemistry, we’ve teamed up with Hiverge, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NVIDIA to explore using AI to improve algorithms for combinatorial optimization.
With the rapid rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), people started asking “what if AI agents can serve as on-demand algorithm factories?” We have been working with Hiverge, an algorithm discovery company, AWS, and NVIDIA, to explore how LLMs can accelerate quantum computing research.
Hiverge – named for Hive, an AI that can develop algorithms – aims to make quantum algorithm design more accessible to researchers by translating high-level problem descriptions in mostly natural language into executable quantum circuits. The Hive takes the researcher’s initial sketch of an algorithm, as well as special constraints the researcher enumerates, and evolves it to a new algorithm that better meets the researcher’s needs. The output is expressed in terms of a familiar programming language, like Guppy or NVIDIA CUDA-Q, making it particularly easy to implement.
The AI is called a “Hive” because it is a collective of LLM agents, all of whom are editing the same codebase. In this work, the Hive was made up of LLM powerhouses such as Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, Llama, as well as NVIDIA Nemotron, which was accessed through AWS’ Amazon Bedrock service. Many models are included because researchers know that diversity is a strength – just like a team of human researchers working in a group, a variety of perspectives often leads to the strongest result.
Once the LLMs are assembled, the Hive calls on them to do the work writing the desired algorithm; no new training is required. The algorithms are then executed and their ‘fitness’ (how well they solve the problem) is measured. Unfit programs do not survive, while the fittest ones evolve to the next generation. This process repeats, much like the evolutionary process of nature itself.
After evolution, the fittest algorithm is selected by the researchers and tested on other instances of the problem. This is a crucial step as the researchers want to understand how well it can generalize.
In this most recent work, the joint team explored how AI can assist in the discovery of heuristic quantum optimization algorithms, a class of algorithms aimed at improving efficiency across critical workstreams. These span challenges like optimal power grid dispatch and storage placement, arranging fuel inside nuclear reactors, and molecular design and reaction pathway optimization in drug, material, and chemical discovery—where solutions could translate into maximizing operational efficiency, dramatic reduction in costs, and rapid acceleration in innovation.
In other AI approaches, such as reinforcement learning, models are trained to solve a problem, but the resulting "algorithm" is effectively ‘hidden’ within a neural network. Here, the algorithm is written in Guppy or CUDA-Q (or Python), making it human-interpretable and easier to deploy on new problem instances.
This work leveraged the NVIDIA CUDA-Q platform, running on powerful NVIDIA GPUs made accessible by AWS. It’s state-of-the art accelerated computing was crucial; the research explored highly complex problems, challenges that lie at the edge of classical computing capacity. Before running anything on Quantinuum’s quantum computer, the researchers first used NVIDIA accelerated computing to simulate the quantum algorithms and assess their fitness. Once a promising algorithm is discovered, it could then be deployed on quantum hardware, creating an exciting new approach for scaling quantum algorithm design.
More broadly, this work points to one of many ways in which classical compute, AI, and quantum computing are most powerful in symbiosis. AI can be used to improve quantum, as demonstrated here, just as quantum can be used to extend AI. Looking ahead, we envision AI evolving programs that express a combination of algorithmic primitives, much like human mathematicians, such as Peter Shor and Lov Grover, have done. After all, both humans and AI can learn from each other.
As quantum computing power grows, so does the difficulty of error correction. Meeting that demand requires tight integration with high-performance classical computing, which is why we’ve partnered with NVIDIA to push the boundaries of real-time decoding performance.
Realizing the full power of quantum computing requires more than just qubits, it requires error rates low enough to run meaningful algorithms at scale. Physical qubits are sensitive to noise, which limits their capacity to handle calculations beyond a certain scale. To move beyond these limits, physical qubits must be combined into logical qubits, with errors continuously detected and corrected in real time before they can propagate and corrupt the calculation. This approach, known as fault tolerance, is a foundational requirement for any quantum computer intended to solve problems of real-world significance.
Part of the challenge of fault tolerance is the computational complexity of correcting errors in real time. Doing so involves sending the error syndrome data to a classical co-processor, solving a complex mathematical problem on that processor, then sending the resulting correction back to the quantum processor - all fast enough that it doesn’t slow down the quantum computation. For this reason, Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is currently one of the most demanding use-cases for tight coupling between classical and quantum computing.
Given the difficulty of the task, we have partnered with NVIDIA, leaders in accelerated computing. With the help of NVIDIA’s ultra-fast GPUs (and the GPU-accelerated BP-OSD decoder developed by NVIDIA as part of NVIDIA CUDA-Q QEC library), we were able to demonstrate real-time decoding of Helios’ qubits, all in a system that can be connected directly to our quantum processors using NVIDIA NVQLink.
While real-time decoding has been demonstrated before (notably, by our own scientists in this study), previous demonstrations were limited in their scalability and complexity.
In this demonstration, we used Brings’ code, a high-rate code that is possible with our all-to-all connectivity, to encode our physical qubits into noise-resilient logical qubits. Once we had them encoded, we ran gates as well as let them idle to see if we could catch and correct errors quickly and efficiently. We submitted the circuits via both NVIDIA CUDA-Q as well as our own Guppy language, underlining our commitment to accessible, ecosystem-friendly quantum computing.
The results were excellent: we were able to perform low-latency decoding that returned results in the time we needed, even for the faster clock cycles that we expect in future generation machines.
A key part of the achievement here is that we performed something called “correlated” decoding. In correlated decoding, you offload work that would normally be performed on the QPU onto the classical decoder. This is because, in ‘standard’ decoding, as you improve your error correction capabilities, it takes more and more time on the QPU. Correlated decoding elides this cost, saving QPU time for the tasks that only the quantum computer can do.
Stay tuned for our forthcoming paper with all the details.
Every year, APS Global Physics Summit brings together scientific community members from around the world across all disciplines of physics.
Join Quantinuum at this year’s conference, taking place in our backyard, Denver, Colorado, from March 15th – 20th, where we will showcase how our quantum hardware, software, and partnerships are helping define the next era of high-performance and quantum computing.
Find our team at booth #1020 and join our sessions below to discover how we’re advancing quantum technologies and building the bridge between HPC and quantum.
Monday, March 16th
Programmable quantum matter at the frontier of classical computation
Speaker: Andrew Potter
Time: 10:12 – 10:48 am
Benchmarking a 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer
Speaker: Charles Baldwin
Time: 12:36 – 12:48 pm
High-Fidelity Quantum operations in the Helios Barium-Ion Processor
Speaker: Anthony Ransford
Time: 4:18 – 4:30 pm
Generative AI Model for Quantum State Preparation
Speaker: Jem Guhit
Time: 4:42 – 4:54 pm
Quantum digital simulations of holographic models using Quantinuum Systems
Speaker: Enrico Rinaldi
Time: 5:54 – 6:30 pm
Tuesday, March 17th
Software-Enabled Innovations that Drive Robust Commercial Operation on Quantinuum Helios
Speaker: Caroline Figgatt
Time: 8:00 – 8:12 am
Improving Clock Speed in the Quantinuum Helios Quantum Computer
Speaker: Adam Reed
Time: 8:12 – 8:24 am
Less Quantum, More Advantage: An End-to-End Quantum Algorithm for the Jones Polynomial
Speaker: Konstantinos Meichanetzidis
Time: 8:48 – 9:00 am
Quantum Operation Pipelining in the Quantinuum Helios Processor
Speaker: Colin Kennedy
Time: 9:00 - 9:12 am
Directly estimating the fidelity of measurement-based quantum computation
Speaker: David Stephen
Time: 9:12 - 9:24 am
Logical algorithms in a quantum error-detecting code on a trapped-ion quantum processor
Speaker: Matthew DeCross
Time: 9:36 - 9:48 am
Separate and efficient characterization of SPAM errors in the presence of leakage
Speaker: Leigh Norris
Time: 10:00 - 10:12 am
Logical benchmarking on a trapped-ion quantum processor
Speaker: Andrew Guo
Time: 12:00 - 12:12 pm
Modelling Actinides Chemistry with Trapped Ion Quantum Computers
Speaker: Carlo Alberto Gaggioli
Time: 3:30 - 3:42 pm
Wednesday, March 18th
Digital quantum magnetism at the frontier of classical simulation
Speaker: Michael Foss-Feig
Time: 8:36 - 9:12 am
Shorter width truncated Taylor series for Hamiltonian dynamics simulations
Speaker: Michelle Wynne Sze
Time: 9:24 - 9:36 am
Quantum-Accelerated DFT+DMFT for Correlated Subspaces in Hemoglobin
Speaker: Juan Pedersen
Time: 9:48 - 10:00 am
Simple logical quantum computation with concatenated symplectic double codes
Speaker: Noah Berthusen
Time: 12:48 - 1:00 pm
When is enough enough? Efficient estimation of quantum properties by stopping early
Speaker: Oliver Hart
Time: 12:48 - 1:00 pm
High-Level Programming of the Quantinuum Helios Processor
Speaker: John Campora
Time: 1:48 - 2:24 pm
Error detection without post-selection in adaptive quantum circuits
Speaker: Eli Chertkov
Time: 4:42 - 4:54 pm
Thursday, March 19th
Below Threshold Logical Quantum Computation at Quantinuum
Speaker: Shival Dasu
Time: 8:00 - 8:36 am
Performing optimal phase measurements with a universal quantum processor
Speaker: Ross Hutson
Time: 8:36 - 8:48 am
Benchmarking with leakage heralded measurements on the Quantinuum Helios processor
Speaker: Victor Colussi
Time: 10:00 am
High-throughput bidirectional microwave-to-optical transduction assessed with a practical quantum capacity
Speaker: Maxwell Urmey
Time: 12:00 - 12:36 pm
Fast quantum state preparation via AI-based Graph Decimation
Speaker: Matteo Puviani
Time: 5:54 - 6:06 pm
Friday, March 20th
2D Tensor Network Methods for Simulation of Spin Models on Quantum Computers
Speaker: Reza Haghshenas
Time: 8:36 - 8:48 am
High-Performance Computing Simulations for Optical Multidimensional Coherent Spectroscopy Studies of Strained Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Diamond
Speaker: Imran Bashir
Time: 10:36 - 10:48 am
High-Performance Statevector Simulation for TKET and Selene with NVIDIA cuStateVec
Speaker: Fabian Finger
Time: 12:36 - 12:48 pm
Part 1: Logic gates on High-rate Quantum LDPC codes using ion trap devices
Speaker: Elijah Durso-Sabina
Time: 12:48 - 1:00 pm
Driving Quantum Computing Forward: QEC, Hardware, and Applications with Quantinuum
Speaker: Natalie Brown
Time: 1:12 - 1:48 pm
A new QCCD computer and new applications
Speaker: Anthony Ransford
Time: 2:24 - 3:00 pm
*All times in MT