

When thinking about changes in phases of matter, the first images that come to mind might be ice melting or water boiling. The critical point in these processes is located at the boundary between the two phases – the transition from solid to liquid or from liquid to gas.
Phase transitions like these get right to the heart of how large material systems behave and are at the frontier of research in condensed matter physics for their ability to provide insights into emergent phenomena like magnetism and topological order. In classical systems, phase transitions are generally driven by thermal fluctuations and occur at finite temperature. On the contrary, quantum systems can exhibit phase transitions even at zero temperatures; the residual fluctuations that control such phase transitions at zero temperature are due to entanglement and are entirely quantum in origin.
Quantinuum researchers recently used the H1-1 quantum computer to computationally model a group of highly correlated quantum particles at a quantum critical point — on the border of a transition between a paramagnetic state (a state of magnetism characterized by a weak attraction) to a ferromagnetic one (characterized by a strong attraction).
Simulating such a transition on a classical computer is possible using tensor network methods, though it is difficult. However, generalizations of such physics to more complicated systems can pose serious problems to classical tensor network techniques, even when deployed on the most powerful supercomputers. On a quantum computer, on the other hand, such generalizations will likely only require modest increases in the number and quality of available qubits.
In a technical paper submitted to the arXiv, Probing critical states of matter on a digital quantum computer, the Quantinuum team demonstrated how the powerful components and high fidelity of the H-Series digital quantum computers could be harnessed to tackle a 128-site condensed matter physics problem, combining a quantum tensor network method with qubit reuse to make highly productive use of the 20-qubit H1-1 quantum computer.
Reza Haghshenas, Senior Advanced Physicist, and the lead author the paper said, “This is the kind of problem that appeals to condensed-matter physicists working with quantum computers, who are looking forward to revealing exotic aspects of strongly correlated systems that are still unknown to the classical realm. Digital quantum computers have the potential to become a versatile tool for working scientists, particularly in fields like condensed matter and particle physics, and may open entirely new directions in fundamental research.”

Tensor networks are mathematical frameworks whose structure enables them to represent and manipulate quantum states in an efficient manner. Originally associated with the mathematics of quantum mechanics, tensor network methods now crop up in many places, from machine learning to natural language processing, or indeed any model with a large number of interacting, high-dimensional mathematical objects.
The Quantinuum team described using a tensor network method--the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA)--to produce accurate estimates for the decay of ferromagnetic correlations and the ground state energy of the system. MERA is particularly well-suited to studying scale invariant quantum states, such as ground states at continuous quantum phase transitions, where each layer in the mathematical model captures entanglement at different scales of distance.
“By calculating the critical state properties with MERA on a digital quantum computer like the H-Series, we have shown that research teams can program the connectivity and system interactions into the problem,” said Dave Hayes, Lead of the U.S. quantum theory team at Quantinuum and one of the paper’s authors. “So, it can, in principle, go out and simulate any system that you can dream of.”
In this experiment, the researchers wanted to accurately calculate the ground state of the quantum system in its critical state. This quantum system is composed of many tiny quantum magnets interacting with one another and pointing in different directions, known as a quantum spin model. In the paramagnetic phase, tiny, individual magnets in the material are randomly oriented, and only correlated with each other over small length-scales. In the ferromagnetic phase, these individual atomic magnetic moments align spontaneously over macroscopic length scales due to strong magnetic interactions.
In the computational model, the quantum magnets were initially arranged in one dimension, along a line. To describe the critical point in this quantum magnetism problem, particles in the line needed to be entangled with one another in a complex way, making this as a very challenging problem for a classical computer to solve in high dimensional and non-equilibrium systems.
“That's as hard as it gets for these systems,” Dave explained. “So that's where we want to look for quantum advantage – because we want the problem to be as hard as possible on the classical computer, and then have a quantum computer solve it.”
To improve the results, the team used two error mitigation techniques, symmetry-based error heralding, which is made possible by the MERA structure, and zero-noise extrapolation, a method originally developed by researchers at IBM. The first involved enforcing local symmetry in the model so that errors affecting the symmetry of the state could be detected. The second strategy, zero-noise extrapolation, involves adding noise to the qubits to measure the impact it has, and then using those results to extrapolate the results that would be expected under conditions with less noise than was present in the experiment.
The Quantinuum team describes this sort of problem as a stepping-stone, which allows the researchers to explore quantum tensor network methods on today’s devices and compare them either to simulations or analytical results produced using classical computers. It is a chance to learn how to tackle a problem really well before quantum computers scale up in the future and begin to offer solutions that are not possible to achieve on classical computers.
“Potentially, our biggest applications over the next couple of years will include studying solid-state systems, physics systems, many-body systems, and modeling them,” said Jenni Strabley, Senior Director of Offering Management at Quantinuum.
The team now looks forward to future work, exploring more complex MERA generalizations to compute the states of 2D and 3D many-body and condensed matter systems on a digital quantum computer – quantum states that are much more difficult to calculate classically.
The H-Series allows researchers to simulate a much broader range of systems than analog devices as well as to incorporate quantum error mitigation strategies, as demonstrated in the experiment. Plus, Quantinuum’s System Model H2 quantum computer, which was launched earlier this year, should scale this type of simulation beyond what is possible using classical computers.
Quantinuum, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. Quantinuum’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, Quantinuum leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
Quantum computing has moved from a bet on the future to a race already underway. Early adopters are locking in strategic partnerships, building proprietary IP, and positioning themselves years ahead of competitors who are still watching from the sidelines. For executives, the question isn't whether to engage with quantum computing. It's how far along that journey your organization actually is, and what it takes to move forward.
That's a harder question to answer than it sounds. Quantum maturity isn't a single milestone you either hit or miss. It's a progression, built across talent, technology access, workflow integration, partnerships, and value realization, and most organizations aren't entirely sure where they currently stand and what to do next.
Our new paper, A Roadmap for Quantum Maturity, is built to answer exactly that.
Drawing on extensive client experience, the paper lays out five distinct levels of quantum maturity, from early awareness through full transformation, along with the leadership actions that move an organization from one level to the next.
Most industry leaders today sit at the exploration or experimentation stages, with clear ambitions to reach transformation within the next several years. The paper breaks down what separates organizations that progress from those that stall out at proof-of-concept.

One of the paper's central takeaways is one many executives underestimate: investing in quantum technology alone isn't enough. Organizations that advance fastest pair that investment with a deliberate strategy, building quantum literacy across leadership and technical teams, honestly assessing capability gaps, focusing on a small number of high-impact use cases tied to real business metrics, and defining a clear roadmap that connects research to business advantage.
Achieving quantum maturity is a journey, not a single step, and most organizations don't need to make that journey alone. Quantinuum's consulting services are built to support every stage of it, from advisory and use-case identification, to capability building, technology access, and the co-development of scalable quantum solutions.
Whether your organization is just starting to build awareness or already scaling toward transformation, our team can help you identify exactly where you stand today, and what it takes to move to the next level.
Quantum computing is increasingly moving from exploratory discussion to structured enterprise planning. As organizations begin to assess where and when quantum technologies may deliver real business impact, a new class of work is emerging: integrated roadmaps that connect algorithmic feasibility, hardware development, and commercial opportunity.
A recent white paper from SoftBank Corp. and Quantinuum represents one of the most comprehensive examples of this approach to date. Rather than treating quantum computing as a distant, abstract capability, the study constructs a detailed, quantitative framework for understanding how real-world use cases evolve as hardware matures—and what this means for enterprise strategy.
The SoftBank–Quantinuum white paper is broad in scope. It attempts to answer a fundamental question:
Which real-world problems can benefit from quantum computation, at what scale, with what accuracy requirements, and under what hardware conditions?
To address this, the study adopts a structured methodology that connects:
Two representative domains anchor the analysis:
These domains were selected because they combine industrial relevance with computational structures that scale poorly on classical systems but map naturally onto quantum approaches.
Quantum chemistry is closely tied to materials science, energy systems, and the development of sustainable technologies. TDA, by contrast, offers tools for understanding complex data structures in networks, finance, and large-scale systems—where identifying structure and anomalies is increasingly critical.
Together, they illustrate how quantum computing may create value across both deep scientific domains and high-impact data applications.
An important caveat is that the resulting roadmap assumes a widely-studied but inefficient error correcting code. As more error correcting codes come online, the resources required to run algorithms will shrink. That means that the timelines detailed in this work can be thought of as “worst case” scenarios, which adds to the value by setting out a clear limit.
A distinguishing feature of the work is its emphasis on implementation over abstraction. Rather than relying solely on theoretical models, the study explicitly constructs quantum circuits and executes them on Quantinuum’s Helios and H2 system.
A notable insight from the study is that quantum value creation will not follow a single linear path.
Instead, two complementary regimes are expected to emerge:
This dual-track structure is important: it shows that quantum computing is not a single “threshold technology,” but a spectrum of capabilities that unlock value at different stages of maturity.
The framework ultimately supports a broader strategic vision: the evolution of Quantum AI Data Centers—hybrid infrastructures where quantum processors operate alongside AI and classical HPC systems.
For enterprises, the implication is clear: quantum computing readiness is no longer about speculation. It is about structured preparation, disciplined modeling, and early engagement with the full stack of capabilities that will define the next generation of computational infrastructure.
Every year, The IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering – or IEEE Quantum Week – brings together engineers, scientists, researchers, students, and others to learn about advancements in quantum computing. This year’s conference, from September 13th - 18th in Toronto, Canada, will focus on translating research into real-world impact through the convergence of generative AI, distributed quantum systems, and quantum software engineering.
Throughout IEEE Quantum Week, our quantum experts will be on-site to share insights on upgrades to our hardware, enhancements to our software stack, our path to error correction, and more.
Meet our team at Booth #501 and join the below sessions to discover how Quantinuum is forging the path to fault-tolerant quantum computing with our integrated full-stack.
5:00 – 6:30pm | 800 Hall G
Quantum computing has passed the point where error correction is theoretical. What comes next depends on systems that hold logical performance steady and do real work at scale. On September 14th, join Quantinuum’s CEO Dr. Rajeeb Hazra for his keynote session on “Logically Speaking: The Next Era of Error Correction” where he will explore what the next era of quantum computing requires: shared definitions of logical performance, and benchmarks built on real workloads.
11:00 – 11:12am | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: QGenAI: Synergies between Quantum Computing and Generative Artificial Intelligence
Finding Compatible Datasets for Quantum Generative Modeling
Presenting Author: Chen-Yu Liu
1:00 – 1:20pm | Location: 701B
Workshop: Q3-Control: Integrated Systems for Quantum Computing, Sensing, and Networking
Cryo-ASICs for Scalable Control
Speaker: Dr. Patty Lee
2:30 – 3:30pm | Exhibit Hall (informal event)
Workshop: Q3-Control: Integrated Systems for Quantum Computing, Sensing, and Networking
The Quantum Spectrum
Speaker: Dr. Patty Lee
3:00 – 4:30pm | Location: 801A
Where Quantum-HPC Integration Actually Stands in 2026
Panelist: Neal Erickson
3:00 – 4:30pm | Location: 718A
From Research to Commercialization: Defining the Quantum Workforce for the Next Five Years
Panelist: Kortny Rolston-Duce
September 16th
10:00 – 11:30am | Location: 801B
Who Will Turn Quantum Computing into Value? Specialists, Domain Experts, and the Workforce Gap
Panelist: Enrico Rinaldi
10:00 – 11:30am | Location: 701B
International Workshop on Quantum Computing for Power Systems: From Optimization Algorithms to Grid-Scale Applications | Session 1
Organizer: Kortny Rolston-Duce
10:00 – 11:30am | Location: 714A
openQSE: Co-Designing the Quantum-HPC Software Stack from Applications to Control Systems | Session 1
Speaker: Neal Erickson
10:00 – 11:30am
The Impact of Qubit Connectivity on Quantum Advantage in Noisy IQP Circuits
Presenting Author: Leonardo Placidi
10:15 – 11:00 am | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: AI for Circuit Synthesis, Optimization, and Discovery
Automated near-term quantum algorithm discovery
Speaker: Konstantinos Meichanetzidis
11:00 – 11:15am | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: AI for Circuit Synthesis, Optimization, and Discovery
Fast Stabilizer State Preparation via AI-Optimized Graph Decimation
Presenting Author: Jasmine Brewer
1:00 – 1:15pm | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: AI for Circuit Synthesis, Optimization, and Discovery
Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Composition of Quantum Circuit Optimisation Passes
Speaker: Gabriel Matos
1:00 – 1:20am | 718B
Quantum Software 2.6: current challenges and headways in quantum software | Session 1
Quantum compilation and hybrid compilation
Speaker: Ross Duncan
1:00 – 2:30pm | Location: 714A
openQSE: Co-Designing the Quantum-HPC Software Stack from Applications to Control Systems | Session 2
Speaker: Phillipp Seitz
1:45 – 2:00pm | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: AI for Circuit Synthesis, Optimization, and Discovery
Graph-Theoretic Quantum Circuit Optimization with the ZX-Calculus and Gumbel AlphaZero
Speaker: Alexander Koziell-Pipe
2:00 – 2:15pm | Location: 601A/B
Workshop: AI for Circuit Synthesis, Optimization, and Discovery
Reusable Equivariant Neural Compilers for Matrix-Group Quantum Circuit Synthesis
Speaker: Richie Yeung
3:30 - 4:00pm | Location: 715B
Workshop: 4th Workshop on Quantum Computing for Natural Sciences: Technology and Applications
Quantum Algorithms
Speaker: Setso Metodi
10:00 – 11:30am | Location: 801B
Scalable QPU architectures
Panelist: Setso Metodi